I finally received my first subscription to the Zero to Three Newsletter via email, so I wanted to review some of the topics covered in this month's edition. Ironically, the first topic of discussion is about the recent budget cuts to Head Start program funding by about a quarter. McCartney states in her article Cutting Head Start is bad fiscal policy that 218,000 poor children will be dropped from the program and 55,000 Head Start program workers will lose their job (2011). I thought this tied back to the discussions we’ve been posting this week in regards to the need to provide financial support to early childhood education.
In 2010, the country invested more than $7 billion to prepare poor preschoolers for school success. This is a lot of money, but there is ample evidence that early childhood education more than pays for itself (McCartney, 2011).
James Heckman’s research through the University of Chicago shows evidence that "waiting until age 5 to begin formal education is too late for disadvantaged children as we miss the opportunity to build on success" (McCartney, 2011). Although I am not directly involved in a Head Start program in my professional role in education, I do feel like the challenges of funding cuts are affecting more programs and I should be aware of ongoing trends throughout the field of education.
Another topic in the Zero to Three Newsletter discussed one particular effect of cutting was discussed in an article titled Cutting Kindergarten. There are approximately 85,000 students enrolled in kindergarten in the state of Pennsylvania and 75 percent are in full-day programs funded by ABG grants, according to Kathy Geller Myers, communication director for PA Promise for Children (Alexander, 2011). With talk of eliminating the ABG grants, it’s quite possible that these programs are at risk of being cut as a result of funding losses. Considering the number of students this full-day kindergarten program serves alone is a significant piece of care lost in the PA schools. Our facility happens to have a full-day kindergarten class as well as a PM enrichment class for those kindergartners that attend an AM program at the public schools. The fact that the state is considering cutting grant funding that support other full-day programs indicates a trend of less kindergarten opportunities available and parents will begin to look toward other program options. The political and economic force behind this decision to remove ABG grants for full-day kindergarten in PA schools certainly displays the power that government law has on education at the early childhood level.
References
Alexander, Amanda. (2011). Cutting Kindergarten. Sun Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.sungazette.com/page/content.detail/id/561624/Cutting-kindergarten.html
McCartney, Kathleen. (2011). Cutting Head Start is bad fiscal policy. CNN. Retrieved from http://articles.cnn.com/2011-03-14/opinion/mccartney.head.start_1_early-childhood-education-poor-children-single-best-investment?_s=PM:OPINION